4 Comments

  1. I LOVE this movie, and this is an insightful analysis. Last time I saw it, I was really struck by how prominently Mary’s (actual, non-metaphorical) hunger figured into the plot. As you point out, it’s really visceral in the shots of Arthur watching the other diners in the automat, and running to the fridge. At the same time, the movie is hilariously zany, and successfully romantic (even the relationship between Arnold and Nash actually turns out to be rather sweet). Not an easy combo to pull off.

    • Thank you! I’m really amazed at the tone too. As you say, not at all easy to pull off. I think the first time I saw it, I only noticed the zaniness. But multiple viewings reveal just how nuanced it is. I agree that both relationships are sweet in the end. I particularly enjoy the Mary-John job search:)

  2. Oh, I love this one! 1930s movies always have such a great sense of the “haves” and “have nots”—and even when indulging in over-the-top luxury on screen, they always seem to maintain a rational perspective on the opulence. You’re right that a lot of today’s media has a way more muddled viewpoint on how we’re supposed to feel… Sturges was much more clear (and nuanced)!

Leave a Reply