For those of you who love both versions of The Thomas Crown Affair (and why wouldn’t you?), it can be tough to determine which of these slick, funny, seductive films is superior. But today I’ll make an attempt. I’d love to hear your opinions in the comments–1999, or 1968?
The crime. This may be an unfair one, as there have been too many good bank robbery movies between 1968 and 1999 for me to give 1968’s crime its due. Still, I preferred the 1999 one–the heaters were such a nifty trick. But both films’ clever capers hold up.
Male leads: Pierce Brosnan is not as attractive as Steve McQueen (who is?). But Brosnan is more convincing as a rich dude who pulls a crime because he’s bored. Also, McQueen’s lack of affect starts to grate after a while. Brosnan oozes charm. That said, McQueen’s laugh when he pulls off his caper is phenomenal.
Female leads: I am a lukewarm Dunaway fan. I like her style, confidence, charisma. I found her mesmerizing in Network and Bonnie and Clyde. I loved her in Columbo. But I disliked her performance in Three Days of the Condor and thought her histrionics in Mommy Dearest insufferable. She fits this role, but Rene Russo just owns her film, and her range is fantastic in it. Russo is also really, really funny. Dunaway has a hard time pulling off humor that isn’t smug.
Music? Love “The Windmills of your Mind” song In both. 10/10.
Sexiest scene: Dance scene (1999) vs. chess scene (1968).
It’s a close one. Generally, I think Russo is sexier than Dunaway–plus thrilling music–and that dress!
That said, I’m not exactly on solid ground saying Russo is sexier in hers.
In terms of male leads, though, I know I’m right: McQueen out-cools Brosnan in every way, and is smoking hot in every scene.
However, I would still argue it’s Brosnan’s sexiest performance.
All told, I have to give it to 1968’s version for sexiest scene. First, because it deserves extra points for making chess seductive. Second, because Brosnan’s delivery of “Do you wanna dance, or do you wanna dance?” hurts me.
Other Characters. No one in the 1968 version is as fun as Dennis Leary or Frankie Faison. But Jack Weston is great at playing a sap.
The Fashion. A tie, I’d say. I prefer Russo’s impossibly luxe wardrobe and killer sunglasses.
I’m not a fan of fur, but that leather outfit in her break-in scene kills me.
Dunaway’s fashion is fantastic in The Thomas Crown Affair too, and those hats are amazing. Plus, the actress always looks like she was born in whatever she wears.
The Script. The writing is better in the 1999 film–though I will admit that many of the best lines are pulled straight from the original. But the characters are more likable and nuanced in the 1999 version. The inclusion of the sailboat crash scene nails Crown’s excesses. The 1999 film is funnier (which I prefer). And Russo’s Catherine is a more powerful feminist (with her smarts and savvy and outplaying everyone) than Dunaway’s Vicki is, though I think they make Catherine too vulnerable in the end.
Editing. I love the clever transitions and cuts in the 1999 remake, but the 1968 version is more streamlined. The 1999 one could use some trimming in the second half.
In-Jokes. Loved Dunaway as the snarky psychiatrist for Brosnan’s Crown. We assume her commentary on porcupines to be from her own experience (from her 1968 caper), right? That’s SUCH a fun twist.
The Ending. 1968 does it for me. It’s poignant, and far more probable than 1999’s.
Because of the script and Russo’s performance, I’d give it to 1999, but it’s a tight one! How about you?
I’ve only seen the remake, I did like the Dennis Leary character. I did not like the Dunaway character that you liked, I was thinking any psychologist who talked to a patient the way she did should have her license yanked. Very unprofessional.
You aren’t wrong! She was terrible as a psychologist, and I agree on her lack of professionalism. As a plot device, though, I enjoyed her.
I have to go with the 1999 version, too, and maybe it’s because I saw it before the Steve McQueen/Faye Dunaway version.
You made excellent points with both versions, though.
I think you’re right. It makes a huge difference which you viewed first!
Original for me and can’t agree with Russo being sexier than Faye Dunaway
For me, it’s kind of scene by scene which one is sexier, but Dunaway is very sexy in it.
I did not like the happy ending of the 1999 version. To me, the whole point of the original was Tommy being one step ahead of everyone. Even when the one he loves betrays him.
I agree. The ending is far more powerful–and fits the story–in the original. I was disappointed in the later version’s.
I enjoyed & appreciate the original but find the remake to be far superior. The fact that Thomas does both the heist & false-return of the painting himself does it for me. I did not like the in-a-suit, from-a-phone style of heist in the original. It really took a lot from the whole plot for me. Additionally, I’ll be forever grateful having been introduced to Nina Simone thanks to this film.
It’s true. The sequel is much more exciting as a result of those choices. And THAT’s a great reason. Her song just kills in this film.
I love the Nina S music too! I am a dance teacher and often used it for tap warm up music…. Super cool music!
That must be so fun! What a great class choice:)).
I have to disagree about who is more appealing…. It’s Pierce B for me. I thought he did a great job in this film besides being so good looking.
He was great in this film! I agree. It’s my favorite of his performances, and definitely his sexiest.