This is an entry in the Great Katharine Hepburn blogathon. Check out the marvelous posts on her work.
“I’d rather look like Katharine Hepburn at 80,” Aunt Betty said, looking at the screen, “than myself at 30.” I looked at the old lady on the TV, then back at my aunt, confused. Maybe Betty was ripping on her own looks, as she often did. She couldn’t possibly be serious. As a fourteen-year-old who longed to resemble Helen Slater or Jamie Gertz, I found wanting to look thirty incomprehensible. Eighty?
My teenage definition of beauty
My aunt smiled at my bafflement. “Just look at that bone structure,” she explained, pointing at Hepburn. “She’s beautiful.”
Bone structure? That wasn’t on my list of attractive characteristics. I examined Hepburn’s face closely to discover what my aunt saw in it, but those wrinkles distracted me. I felt uneasy, as I always did when adults said something I couldn’t understand. I changed the subject.
I didn’t forget it though. Every time I saw Hepburn, the comment returned. She had always looked old to me. Having seen her first in Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner? I could never view her earlier films without seeing the imprint of her older self. Besides, Hepburn was angular, not soft and feminine, like Helen Slater or my earlier womanly ideal, Lynda Carter.
I wasn’t alone, of course, in devaluing Hepburn’s looks. Her employer David O. Selznick had been famous for it. Others, of course, appreciated that bone structure, hence that line about her cheekbones: “The greatest calcium deposits since the White Cliffs of Dover.”
I think I was past thirty myself before I started to understand Betty’s words. Of course, my definition of beauty had expanded by then, but my changing assessment of the actress’s looks was always more complicated than answering pretty or not? First, I noticed Hepburn’s breathless confidence of movement.
Then there were the clothes that suited her, rather than following any passing fashions. And the parts she chose, roles that could inspire women like me, and like my aunt: athletes, business leaders, pioneers, advocates for women.
She always imbued these characters with vulnerability as well as strength, helping viewers see powerful females as fully rounded human beings.
Hepburn’s real-life actions demonstrated the same moxie she expressed in film: fighting back after the box office poison label, establishing her own terms with The Philadelphia Story, and then using her new power to ensure good salaries for her Woman of the Year screenwriters.
In her private life, Hepburn managed to say what she wanted, avoid whom she wished, have a long-time affair with a married man without compromising her career. With her spirit, it’s not surprising that she continued to star as a romantic lead even in her forties.
Now I see in that erect posture of hers in her final years, those fierce expressions, her pride in a life well lived.
How many of us can follow our own standards consistently, passionately, for as many years as she did? No wonder my aunt found Katharine Hepburn so breathtaking at 80. I look at her later performances now, and see the same. Imprinted on Katharine’s Hepburn’s face, her carriage, and even her voice is the caliber of life she lived.
Look at her. Isn’t she beautiful?
A beautiful tribute to a very lovely woman indeed. 🙂
Thank you! It’s such a pleasure to spend time thinking about her, isn’t it? I enjoyed your post so much.
Great write-up Leah! I wholly agree with you, she is indeed beautiful.
Thanks! It’s so easy to see how lovely she is now. What limited taste I had as a teen, huh?:) Leah
I know it’s a cliché but the phrase “grew old gracefully” was never more appropriate.
It’s true. That phrase could have been coined just for her-
Great post! As for myself, I always thought Katharine alluring, but even my 16-year-old self thought Garbo was the greatest beauty on Earth. Yet, I think Kate is fascinating, not only for her looks, but for everything you listed.
Thanks for the kind comment!
Kisses!
Le
Clearly, Le, you had better taste as a teen than I did:) Thank you! I enjoyed your post so much.
I always thought that Katharine Hepburn was absolutely gorgeous. It’s not just her face but how she expresses herself. And let’s face it, she was in good shape. Pat and Mike is proof of that if nothing else.
She wasn’t a “traditional” beauty, but then again, so many of the greats often aren’t. She always stayed true to herself and she didn’t care how other people thought she looked.
But I would kill for those cheekbones.
Enjoyed your post immensely! Here’s the one I did for The Great Katharine Hepburn Blogathon 🙂 https://knifeink.wordpress.com/2015/05/10/my-week-with-kate-and-spence/
Thank you! True! She kept in great shape her whole life, didn’t she? And yes, now I’d kill for those cheekbones too:) I look forward to reading it–
Leah
Very interesting to read this after watching ‘Mary of Scotland’, where she is definitely presented as a great beauty. I find it hard to disentangle thoughts about an actor’s looks from how I feel about them overall, voice, movements etc… and Hepburn is absolutely compelling to watch right through her career.
True. Someone being arresting onscreen can feel the same as beauty. It’s true you can’t keep your eyes off of her.
Lovely post! You said exactly what I was trying to convey in my own post for Kate. Glad to see another participant for the blogathon!
Thanks! Your post was wonderful. And I hadn’t heard some of those quotes–love the one about the inferior sex. You have chosen the ideal role model.:)
Enjoyed your post. Even Katharine’s angular facial features screamed strength, didn’t they? She was a helluva woman.
Thanks, Bonnie! It’s true. Very cool when nature echoes the personality we see:)
Thanks, Bonnie! Isn’t it wonderful when nature echoes the personality?